Student Affairs
On-Line
The On-Line magazine about technology
and Student Affairs


Daniel Salter
Penn State University
Editor

Stuart Brown
StudentAffairs.com
Executive Editor

 

Winter 2001 • Vol. 2, No. 1



Current Issue
Inside this Issue
Letters to the Editor
Submit an Article
Archive of all Issues
Back to StudentAffairs.com

   Join our mailing list!
   First Name
   
   Last Name
   
   School
   
   Email
   

   


   ©2007
   StudentAffairs.com
   All Rights Reserved

   

Online Cheating: A New Twist to an Old Problem

Cary Anderson
Canisius College

Posted February 23, 2001          Student Affairs Online, 2 (Winter)

Dealing with academic dishonesty is always a challenge, and today it is even more complicated by students’ use of the Internet. To be sure, today's easy access to on-line journals and term paper Web sites, coupled with general ignorance of proper citing of on-line resources, necessitates action on the part of an institution's administration. This article is the first of three which examine strategies for dealing with on-line academic misconduct. This first article concerns low-tech techniques for detecting on-line cheating, the first steps if you suspect academic misconduct. The second article will examine high-tech methods for detection; and the third installment will focus on developing methods to address students' underlying values and behaviors. The purpose of all three articles is to improve your knowledge of the issue and provide ideas, both practical and theoretical, to ultimately improve how we teach students to function in cyberspace.

Term paper "mills" have existed for years, usually requiring advanced planning on the part of the recipient student who would need to send for the paper through the mail and then retype it. In contrast, new on-line services make it easy for students to obtain and prepare class papers. Students can simply download a manuscript from one of the many paper mill Web sites, make a few edits on a word processor and submit the paper as their own work.

In addition to the fee-for-service on-line paper mills, there are also free sites, which serve as repositories for papers. Students are asked to donate manuscripts that will be archived and made available for others to use. These sites are akin to the stereotypical "fraternity house paper file," but are international and are much easier to access. Because these sites cost nothing to use, they can make the process more tempting for students to pass off someone else’s work as their own. Although very few on-line term paper Web sites outwardly endorse cheating, their tag lines: "Download your Workload" and "Evil House of Cheat," make it clear that cutting corners and/or outright plagiarism are likely outcomes of their services.

Faculty and administrators should take the time to familiarize themselves with these term paper sites and explore them periodically. Knowledge of these sites, some of which are listed at the end of this article, will be useful when investigating allegations of plagiarism. But also realize that on-line plagiarism is not limited to term paper mills. There is a tremendous amount of legitimate information on the Web, including e-journals, e-books, e-reports, newspapers and governmental reports and databases that are in the public domain, just to name a few. In fact, in today's courses, Web use is properly encouraged as our campuses become more digital. Therefore, the online source of an ill-gained paper or passage is as broad as the entire World Wide Web, and most cheating will not have its genesis from the more obvious sites.

Indeed, catching a student after the cheating has occurred may not be the most developmental approach to dealing with the issue of academic dishonesty, so I will address more proactive methods in the coming months. Even so, we're all aware that cheating does occur and there will be a time when each of us is called upon to determine responsibility. Therefore, it seems prudent to develop a repertoire of techniques that help detect Internet academic dishonesty. There are both high-tech and low-tech methods for revealing on-line cheating. Low-tech methods do not usually prove that a paper has been lifted from the Web, but these techniques can raise a red flag and point to the need for further investigation. Here are a few ideas that do not require a great deal of Internet expertise and may not even require the use of a computer:

  • Many of the paper mill sites are located outside of the U.S. and use British-English spellings for words such as colour and flavour. If these "misspelled" words appear in a student's paper, further investigation may be warranted, unless, of course, the student is not an American-English speaker. When this happened at my own institution, the student readily admitted to his lapse in judgment once confronted with the spelling inconsistency.
  • Furthermore, major publishing houses often have offices and/or subsidiaries outside the U.S. For example, Prentice-Hall is based in Englewood Cliffs, N.J. but also publishes in Sydney, London, New Delhi, and Singapore, among other locations. When a student in another country writes the paper, it is likely that the version of the text that student used was published in his or her own country. So a paper from Australia referencing a Prentice-Hall text will have Sydney as the publication city instead of Englewood, which would be the reference location for the same text found in the U.S. A scan of the reference page may raise questions about the authenticity of the paper. If the reference states that the publication location of a particular book is outside the U.S. but the book in your library or assigned to the class is printed in New Jersey (which is most likely), then you have reason to investigate further.
  • Odd spacing between words or line breaks is another sign that a paper may have come from the Internet. Most times, the student has removed these irregularities and the paper "looks" fine. However, adjusting the margins in or out may uncover odd spacing or line breaks that were missed by the student -- who was only formatting for look. If you suspect that a paper was pirated and you have an electronic copy of the paper (on a disk or as an e-mail attachment), do a quick test: highlight the entire text of the paper and change the margins. Check for spacing inconsistencies that might point to the need for further investigation.
  • Inconsistent quotation marks may be another telltale sign of on-line cheating. Quotation marks typed from within standard word processing programs such Microsoft Word or Word Perfect are usually in the form of printer marks -- the "curly" ones. Quotation marks taken from online material often appear in the "straight" format, like inch or foot notations. Once again inconsistent or just straight quotation marks do not prove cheating, but should raise a red flag.

None of these methods are conclusive in and of themselves, but they can be helpful in an investigation. Once you have completed a low-tech audit of a questionable paper and there seems to be reason for further investigation, a more high-tech inquiry is warranted. In the next issue, these computer-based methods, including the use of commercial detection sites will be discussed.

 

Select Term Paper Mill Sites:

http://www.schoolsucks.com/

http://www.a1-termpaper.com/

http://www.termpapersonline.com/

http://www.researchcentral.com/

http://www.papers-online.com/

http://www.cheathouse.com/

http://www.termpaperwarehouse.com/tpw/

http://www.execpc.com/~hppapers/

 

 

Submit a Letter to the Editor | Printer Friendly Version